Comments
HIGH SPEED RAIL - In a move to ensure accountability and responsible use of federal funds, U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy has directed the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) to conduct a thorough review of the California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA). This review will assess whether approximately $4 billion in taxpayer money should remain committed to the project aimed at constructing high-speed rail in California’s Central Valley, between Merced and Bakersfield.
Cost Overruns and Delays Raise Concerns
Originally planned to be completed by 2020 at a cost of $33 billion, the full San Francisco-to-Los Angeles high-speed rail project has significantly exceeded its budget and timeline. Today, the cost for just the Merced-to-Bakersfield segment surpasses the initial total project estimate, while the full San Francisco-to-Los Angeles line is now projected to cost an astonishing $106 billion—over three times the original estimate.
“For too long, taxpayers have subsidized the massively over-budget and delayed California High-Speed Rail project,” Secretary Duffy stated. “President Trump is right that this project is in dire need of an investigation. That is why I am directing my staff to determine whether CHSRA has fulfilled the commitments it made to receive billions in federal funding. If not, we must consider reallocating those funds to other deserving infrastructure projects across the country.”
Funding Shortfalls and Questionable Viability
A recent report from the California High-Speed Rail Office of the Inspector General highlighted a $6.5 billion funding gap for the Merced-to-Bakersfield segment alone. Even after receiving $4 billion from the Biden Administration, CHSRA is still struggling to meet funding demands. Moreover, projections indicate that the limited Merced-to-Bakersfield segment will generate a mere 2 million riders annually, failing to connect California’s major metropolitan areas and significantly reducing its impact and viability.
Further complicating matters, the CHSRA Peer Review Group, responsible for assessing the project's funding strategies, estimated in March 2023 that the San Francisco-to-Los Angeles corridor faces an unfunded gap ranging from $92.6 billion to $103.1 billion between its estimated costs and currently available state and federal funds. Given these alarming discrepancies, FRA’s compliance and performance review will scrutinize delays, cost overruns, and adherence to grant agreements.
Comparisons to Brightline West’s High-Speed Rail Success
CHSRA’s slow progress starkly contrasts with the rapid development of Brightline West, a private-sector high-speed rail initiative connecting the Los Angeles region to Las Vegas. Brightline West has laid out a concrete plan to commence service by 2028, showcasing efficient execution and cost management.
Federal Oversight and Next Steps
Under Secretary Duffy’s direction, the FRA will review CHSRA’s compliance with FRA-administered grant agreements to determine whether CHSRA has fully met its obligations under federal funding terms. This review will help decide whether taxpayer dollars should continue supporting CHSRA or be redirected to infrastructure projects with greater potential for timely and cost-effective completion.
The results of this review could have significant implications for the future of California’s high-speed rail project and broader national infrastructure funding priorities.
###
