Comments
LA PARKS - Los Angeles officials want taxpayers to focus on one number: $474.6 million.
That is how much the City has budgeted for Recreation and Parks-related spending in Fiscal Year 2026–27 an increase of nearly $55 million, or 13.1%, over the previous year. City Hall will undoubtedly point to the larger budget as evidence that it is investing in parks and improving the quality of life for Angelenos.
But there is another number taxpayers should remember.
93rd.
That is where Los Angeles ranks among the nation's 100 largest cities in the Trust for Public Land's 2026 ParkScore index.
Even more troubling, it took a federal court order to require the City to address accessibility barriers that prevented many residents with mobility disabilities from fully using public parks and recreation facilities.
Those two facts tell the real story.
If nearly half a billion dollars cannot produce an accessible, equitable and well-maintained park system, taxpayers have every right to ask where the money is going.
The lawsuit alleged that Los Angeles failed to properly construct, alter and maintain numerous park facilities for people who rely on wheelchairs, scooters, walkers, canes and other mobility aids. The barriers reportedly extended throughout the park system from parking spaces and sidewalks to playgrounds, picnic areas, recreation centers and senior centers.
The plaintiffs were not seeking financial damages.
They wanted the City to comply with federal disability laws and remove barriers that should never have existed in the first place.
In January, U.S. District Judge R. Gary Klausner granted injunctive relief, requiring the City to move forward with accessibility improvements.
That alone should concern every taxpayer.
Government should not have to be ordered by a federal judge to provide equal access to public facilities. Compliance with civil rights laws should be a basic responsibility not something achieved only after years of litigation.
Yet while the City celebrates a larger parks budget, its overall performance tells a different story.
Only 62% of Los Angeles residents live within a 10-minute walk of a park, well below the 76% national average among the nation's largest cities. According to the Trust for Public Land, neighborhoods of color have 79% less park space per resident than predominantly white neighborhoods and 54% less than the citywide average.
Those disparities cannot simply be explained by funding.
They raise legitimate questions about planning, priorities and accountability.
Meanwhile, the City continues increasing expenditures. Recreation and Parks will receive $371.9 million directly, while additional funding flows through capital projects, engineering, infrastructure programs and other city departments. Salary costs are rising. Maintenance budgets are increasing. Additional positions are being funded. Tens of millions more are allocated for facilities, aquatics, park rangers, utilities and sanitation.
None of those investments are inherently wrong.
Parks require employees, maintenance and long-term capital improvements.
But government spending should be judged by results not by the size of its appropriations.
Taxpayers are not asking how much the City spends.
They are asking what the City delivers.
Do families have clean and safe parks?
Can seniors comfortably access recreation centers?
Can children safely use playgrounds?
Can residents with disabilities enjoy public facilities without encountering barriers that violate federal law?
Those are the standards that matter not the number of dollars printed in a budget book.
Unfortunately, this reflects a broader pattern in Los Angeles.
Whether the issue is homelessness, deteriorating infrastructure, public safety or neighborhood parks, City Hall frequently responds to poor performance by appropriating more money while avoiding difficult questions about effectiveness, oversight and measurable outcomes.
The result is predictable: larger budgets, growing bureaucracy and public services that too often fail to meet reasonable expectations.
A city spending nearly $475 million on its park system should not rank near the bottom nationally.
A city spending that much should not leave significant portions of its population without nearby park access.
And a city spending that much should never require a federal court order to address barriers that prevent residents with disabilities from fully using public parks.
Those failures are not simply financial.
They are failures of leadership.
Los Angeles does not suffer from a shortage of public spending.
It suffers from a shortage of accountability.
Until City Hall measures success by outcomes rather than appropriations, taxpayers will continue paying more while expecting and receiving far less.
The size of the budget is not the measure of success.
The quality of the results is.
(Yonthan Mendal is an accomplished writer, researcher and leading expert on Jewish-Arab relations and Middle East affairs. He serves as Director of the Center for Jewish-Arab Relations at the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute and as a Research Fellow at the Forum for Regional Thought. His work focuses on politics, identity, media and regional dynamics in Israel and the broader Middle East. Widely respected for his scholarly analysis and public commentary, Mendel is a prominent voice on democracy, coexistence, public policy and cross-cultural dialogue.)
