Skip to main content

Beyond Bigotry: Court Revokes NFL ‘Redskins’ Trademark

July 09 2015
Written by Lauren McCauley.

THE R-WORD IS HURTFUL-In what is being reported as the biggest legal blow thus far against the contentious Washington D.C. football enterprise, a federal court on Wednesday ruled that the name "Redskins" is disparaging to Native Americans and thus its trademark registration must be revoked. 

In the decision (pdf), Judge Gerald Bruce Lee of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Alexandria, Virginia ordered the federal Patent and Trademark Office to cancel the registration. Though it does not forbid use of the name, the ruling threatens the team's ability to protect its brand or prevent others from selling items with the team's logo.   

The ruling upholds a previous court decision in a case brought by five Native American plaintiffs, led by Navajo activist Amanda Blackhorse, who argued that the team name is offensive and violates the federal Lanham Act, which prohibits trademarks that denigrate people or bring them into "contempt or disrepute." Last August, Blackhorse and the others were sued by the team before the Department of Justice intervened.  

In a statement (pdf), the Change the Mascot campaign celebrated the ruling as victory for Blackhorse and others "at a moment when the country is clearly demanding an end to the bigotry of yore."   

The statement continues: 

Today’s ruling further highlights how the Washington NFL team’s insistence on ignoring the will of an increasingly diverse country has become a crisis for the NFL—and the league’s refusal to use its power to change this offensive name turns its silence into active complicity, associating itself with those who believe people of color deserve to be slurred. ... 

We have seen incredible bipartisan progress in recent weeks surrounding the effort to end the promotion, marketing and profiting off of the Confederate flag. We have seen the highest court in the land move to protect all people’s right to marry, and we’ve now see two separate courts declare that taxpayers are not obligated to effectively subsidize the Washington team’s racial slur by granting it lucrative patent protections. 

Now, Dan Snyder and the NFL must face the fact that the R-word is hurtful and wrong, and that it’s time to do the right thing and change the name. 

The cancellation would not go into effect until the team has gone through all of their appeals. "But even if the Redskins ultimately take the case to the Supreme Court and lose, the team can still use 'Redskins' and seek trademark protections under state law," the Washington Post reports.

(Lauren McCauley writes for Common Dreams … where this column was first posted.)

-cw

 

 

 

CityWatch

Vol 13 Issue 56

Pub: Jul 10, 2015 

Get The News In Your Email Inbox Mondays & Thursdays


Featured CityWatch Stories

WESTSIDE - Currently larger than 40 states in terms of population with roughly 10 million residents, Los Angeles County…
Yom Kippur demands more than personal repentance. At a defining moment for Jews everywhere, it asks whether we have tru…
ANNEXATION - The vision of “Greater Israel” draws on maximalist readings of biblical verses, especially Genesis 15:18–2…
NETANYAHUISM - The next Israeli election may be about something larger than Benjamin Netanyahu. For the first time in a…
LA TRANSPO - For anyone traversing the San Fernando Valley, one thing is becoming increasingly clear: Los Angeles is sp…